Triangle Detection: Difference between revisions

From Algorithm Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
| [[Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives]] ||  style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k\cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithm for any $epsilon > {0}$ for generalized Büchi games. In particular, there is no such algorithm deciding whether the winning set is non-empty or deciding whether a specific vertex is in the winning set. || 2016 || https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05850.pdf || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives|link]]
| [[Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives]] ||  style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k\cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithm for any $epsilon > {0}$ for generalized Büchi games. In particular, there is no such algorithm deciding whether the winning set is non-empty or deciding whether a specific vertex is in the winning set. || 2016 || https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05850.pdf || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives|link]]
|-
|-
| [[Disjunctive Queries of Reachability in MDPs]] ||  style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for target. The bounds holf for dense MDPs with $m=\Theta(n^{2})$ || 2016 || https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive Queries of Reachability in MDPs|link]]
| [[Disjunctive Reachability Queries in MDPs]] ||  style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for target. The bounds holf for dense MDPs with $m=\Theta(n^{2})$ || 2016 || https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive Reachability Queries in MDPs|link]]
|-
|-
| [[Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs]] ||  style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm, for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for disjunctive safety (objectives or queries) in graphs. || 2016 || https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs|link]]
| [[Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs]] ||  style="text-align:left;" | assume: Strong Triangle<br/>then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm, for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for disjunctive safety (objectives or queries) in graphs. || 2016 || https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 || [[Reduction from Triangle Detection to Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs|link]]
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 14:49, 15 February 2023

Description

Determine whether or not there is a triangle in a given graph

Related Problems

Subproblem: Negative Triangle Detection, Nondecreasing Triangle, Minimum Triangle, Triangle in Unweighted Graph, Triangle Collection*

Related: Negative Triangle Search, Negative Triangle Listing, Nondecreasing Triangle, Minimum Triangle, Triangle in Unweighted Graph, Triangle Collection*

Parameters

n: number of vertices

m: number of edges

Table of Algorithms

Currently no algorithms in our database for the given problem.

Reductions TO Problem

Problem Implication Year Citation Reduction
Independent Set Queries if: to-time: $O(n^{2} / \log^c n)$ to answer all subsequent batches of $\log n$ independent set queries from a graph that takes $O(n^k)$ time to preprocess for some $c,k > {0}$
then: from-time: $O(n^{3} / \log^{c+1} n)$
2018 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3186893, Theorem 6.5 link
Dynamic st-Reach assume: SETH
then: for any fixed constants $\epsilon > {0}$, $c_1,c_2 \in ({0},{1})$, on graphs with $n$ nodes $|S|=\tilde{\Theta}(n^{c_1})$, $|T|=\tilde{\Theta(n^{c_2})}$, $m=O(n)$ edges, and capacaties in $\{1,\cdots,n\}$, target cannot be solved in $O((|S|T|m)^{1-\epsilon})$
2014 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6979028?casa_token=daaoBjrHUa4AAAAA:DCjk_WMWZ5Is6KvGpmS8a2bL9LskvV0P1zEG4U2u-Tm_C8sixu1w65OpTyjml1HEpaikXhtYsg link
Strong Connectivity (dynamic) let $\gamma = (w-{1})/(w+{1}) \in ({1}/{3},{0.408})$
if: to-time: $O(m^{2\gamma-\epsilon})$ update and query times even after O(m^{1+\gamma-\epsilon}) preprocessing time for any $\epsilon > {0}$
then: Strong Triangle is false
2014 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6979028?casa_token=daaoBjrHUa4AAAAA:DCjk_WMWZ5Is6KvGpmS8a2bL9LskvV0P1zEG4U2u-Tm_C8sixu1w65OpTyjml1HEpaikXhtYsg link
Dynamic Bipartite Maximum-Weight Matching let $\gamma = (w-{1})/(w+{1}) \in ({1}/{3},{0.408})$
if: to-time: $O(m^{2\gamma-\epsilon})$ update and query times even after O(m^{1+\gamma-\epsilon}) preprocessing time for any $\epsilon > {0}$
then: Strong Triangle is false
2014 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6979028?casa_token=daaoBjrHUa4AAAAA:DCjk_WMWZ5Is6KvGpmS8a2bL9LskvV0P1zEG4U2u-Tm_C8sixu1w65OpTyjml1HEpaikXhtYsg link
Disjunctive coBüchi Objectives assume: Strong Triangle
then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k\cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithm for any $epsilon > {0}$ for generalized Büchi games. In particular, there is no such algorithm deciding whether the winning set is non-empty or deciding whether a specific vertex is in the winning set.
2016 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05850.pdf link
Disjunctive Reachability Queries in MDPs assume: Strong Triangle
then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for target. The bounds holf for dense MDPs with $m=\Theta(n^{2})$
2016 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 link
Disjunctive Queries of Safety in Graphs assume: Strong Triangle
then: there is no combinatorial $O(n^{3-\epsilon})$ or $O((k \cdot n^{2})^{1-\epsilon})$ algorithm, for any $\epsilon > {0}$ for disjunctive safety (objectives or queries) in graphs.
2016 https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2933575.2935304 link